Recently, the popular social media website Digg released a useful but controversial product: the DiggBar, an iframe toolbar that lets users browse other websites without actually leaving Digg.com. In the last week, we’ve already discussed how the DiggBar could impact the Twitter link-sharing experience and Digg’s response to the recent criticism.
This has done little to quell the controversy surrounding the DiggBar, however. Engadget has now blocked the DiggBar. In addition, one popular article, on how to block the DiggBar, received over 1900 diggs but at the same time was buried, showing how divided the Digg community is over the feature. Some of the controversy has been over the impact of the DiggBar on SEO (search engine optimization) and traffic to people’s website.
This is all a bit of a complicated mess. So we’ve put together this article discussing the pro and con arguments for the DiggBar, especially as it relates to the user and to the website owner. After considering the pros and cons, we want to know whether you will block the DiggBar or keep it active.

Just hours after Twitter began removing the first cross-site scripting vulnerability that hit its site this weekend, a new modified strain has been found, and according to F-Secure, it’s not the last one we’re likely to see over the next few days.
Besides checking the length of a South African ID number for validation, our developer
The latest rumor to circulate the Internet is that Google is in the final stages of negotiation to buy Twitter, the micro-blogging service.
A Google Street View car has been chased out of a Buckinghamshire village by angry residents.